|
from:
Cllr Brian Miller
re: Conflict of interests
7 March 2002
Dear
Editor
As
the person who chaired the Development Control Committee which considered
the Twickenham Riverside planning application, I feel that I must
respond to
Ron Harvey's note of 5 March.
The question
of possible conflicts of interest was studied very carefully
before the meeting on 28 February and legal opinion was sought. The
upshot
of this opinion was that no one who was a Member of the Committee
that
evening had prejudiced themselves by any actions they may have taken
earlier. This point was made clear by the Legal Services Officer present
at
the meeting as the meeting itself opened.
The vote
was taken in the usual way at the meeting with Members indicating
how they voted by raising their hands. No response was made to Mr
Harvey's
interjection because the Committee does not take questions or interventions
from the floor and as a regular attendee at Development Control Committee
meetings, Mr Harvey will be aware of this. This point was also covered
in
the meeting notes given to all those who attended.
Mr Harvey
did approach me in the early hours of Friday morning last outside
York House after the meeting as I left the building in the company
of a
fellow Member of the Committee and a senior Council Officer. Mr Harvey
made
his point that Members had voted "on party lines". The fellow
Committee
Member and I stated that was not true as far as we were not concerned.
The Liberal
Democrats, at least, on Richmond Council have never made
planning decisions a party political issue and Liberal Democrat Members
and,
I am sure, members of the other political groups, cast their votes
based
upon the planning merits of any given application. This point is proved
at
almost every Development Control meeting when there is a division
of opinion
on an application.
Brian
Miller
Chair, Development Control Committee
These
letters pages provide a platform for all members of the community
to express their views. Online Communities Ltd and its agents neither
endorse nor condemn the views expressed on these letters pages.
|